Measuring crime 2 essay

This slight is unfortunate, since accurate crime data are needed to adequately test theories of offending and victimization as well as to assess the effectiveness of public policies.

Measuring crime 2 essay

In the records check studies, the samples included known crime victims selected from police records. The studies were done in Washington, D. A key objective of these early studies was to determine the best length for the reporting period for a survey, balancing the need to increase the number of crime reports with the need to reduce memory errors.

Some of these studies were inspired by a conference described in Biderman, that brought cognitive psychologists and survey researchers together to examine the memory issues raised by the NCS. Unfortunately, some of the most intriguing findings from the resulting experiments were never published and are buried in hard-to-find memoranda.

For several reasons, the NCVS results are widely used as benchmarks to which statistics from other surveys on crime and crime victimization are compared. Measuring Crime and Crime Victimization: Measurement Problems in Criminal Justice Research: The National Academies Press.

Measuring Crime - Criminology - Oxford Bibliographies Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Two major crimes reporting programs exist.

Results of the first interview, which is necessarily unbounded, are discarded. The Measuring crime 2 essay interview is done face to face to ensure maximum coverage of the population; if necessary, subsequent interviews are also conducted in person. Examples of Measurement Problems Despite these impressive design features and the large body of methodological work that shaped it, the NCVS is not without its critics.

Two recent controversies illustrate the problems of the NCVS and of crime surveys more generally. One controversy centers on the number of incidents of defensive gun use in the United States; the other concerns the number of incidents of rape.

In both cases, seemingly similar surveys yield widely discrepant results; the ensuing methodological controversies point to unresolved issues in how to collect data on crime, gun use, and crime victimization in surveys.

Defensive Gun Use InMcDowall and Wiersema published an estimate of the number of incidents over a four-year period in which potential crime victims had used guns to protect themselves during an actual or attempted crime.

Defining and Measuring Crime - New York Essays

Their estimate was based on data from the NCVS, which gathers information about several classes of crime—rape, assault, burglary, personal and household larceny, and car theft. The key estimates McDowall and Wiersema presented were that between and there were someincidents of defensive gun use in the United States, roughly 65, per year.

Although big numbers, they pale by comparison with the total number of crimes reported during the same period—guns were used defensively in fewer than one in victimizations reported in the NCVS; moreover, criminal offenders were armed about 10 times more often than their victims.

These are just the sort of statistics dear to gun control advocates. McDowall and Wiersema note, however, that their estimates of defensive gun use differ markedly from those based on an earlier survey by Kleck ; see also Kleck and Gertz, These numbers were derived from a national telephone survey of 1, registered voters who were asked: The two surveys covered different populations the civilian noninstitutional population in the NCVS versus registered voters with a telephone in the Kleck surveyinterviewed respondents by different methods in-person versus telephonecovered different recall periods six months in NCVS versus five years in the Kleck studyand asked their respondents markedly different questions.

Still, the difference between 65, incidents a year and someis quite dramatic and would seem to demand a less mundane explanation than one involving routine methodological differences. A later telephone survey by Kleck and Gertz yielded an even higher estimate—2. McDowall and Wiersema cite two other possible explanations of the differences between the results of the NCVS and the earlier Kleck study.

The later Kleck and Gertz estimates also rest on a similarly small base of positive reports—66 out of nearly 5, completed interviews. Even a few mistaken respondents could have a large impact on the results.

The NCVS excludes preemptive use of firearms e. It is possible that much of the disparity between the NCVS estimates and those derived from the two Kleck studies reflects the broader net cast in the latter surveys.

Respondents were asked both sets of questions—both written to cover a one-year recall period—and the experiment varied which ones came first in the interview. The sample included 3, respondents, selected from a list of likely gun owners. Overall, the Kleck items yielded three times more reports of defensive gun use than the NCVS-style items.

What was particularly interesting in the results was that the two sets of items appeared to yield virtually nonoverlapping sets of incidents; of the 89 reports of defensive gun use, only 9 were mentioned in response to both sets of items.The chapters provide thorough reviews of topics, including measuring crime using victimization and self-report offender surveys as well as measuring particular crimes such as sexual assault.

Biderman, Albert D., and James P.

Measuring crime 2 essay

Lynch. Measuring Crime in the United States Kyra Pettit CJA/ August 5, Dr. Wafeeq Sabir Measuring Crime in the United States In the following paper, these criminal justice students will address the three major points of crime measurement in the United States.

National Crime Reporting is a program that shows the crime statistics of the nation. It is an index of information that is available to federal, state, and local authorities. The major purposes of crime reporting programs are to provide senior officials with an accurate snapshot of crime data that fluctuates.

Measuring Crime Essay Sample. There are three tools used to measure crime in the United States; Uniform Crime Report, National Crime Victimization Survey and National Incident Based Reporting System.

Measuring Crime | Essay Example

Two major crimes reporting programs exist. The first is the Uniform Crimes Reports or UCR (National Institute of Justice, ). Defining and Measuring Crime The Uniform Crime Report (ucr) is an annually (yearly) report compiled by the FBI to give an indication of criminal activity.

They organize offenses known to the police. The I-JCR divides the criminal offenses into categories: part 1 offense and part II offense. Measuring Crime Team D: Alfreda Simmons, Kelly Ashbrook, Lucas Burrington, and Kiavonni Jones CJA/ Introduction to Criminal Justice December 8, Mary Ellen De Frias Measuring Crime The Department of Justice uses two types of programs to measure crime in the United States.

Measuring Crime | Essay Example